Polza.ai VS 
Tokenly
Editorial assessment Good specialized service Good specialized service
User rating +4 +3
Pricing model Pay as you go Pay as you go
Starting price Pay as you go Pay as you go
Free plan No No
Categories LLM aggregators and APIs LLM aggregators and APIs
Checked September 12, 2026 September 11, 2026
Polza.ai Good specialized service +4 Pros
- Unified access to hundreds of models from OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, and others
- Drop-in compatibility with the OpenAI Chat Completions API standard and major SDKs
- Automated provider monitoring with fallback routing during upstream outages
- Transparent pay-as-you-go billing with a single account balance
Cons
- Request latency and time-to-first-token are strictly tethered to upstream provider data centers
- Cloud-only infrastructure without confirmed support for on-premise isolated deployments
- Asynchronous video generation jobs remain vulnerable to external queue delays
Tokenly Good specialized service +3 Pros
- 50% discount compared to official vendor token prices
- Drop-in compatibility with official OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs by changing only the base URL
- Single API key and unified balance across Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, and Google Gemini
- Pay-as-you-go billing model with no recurring subscriptions or mandatory minimums
Cons
- Catalog is strictly limited to Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, and Google Gemini, with no open-weight models supported
- Acts as an intermediary proxy, introducing a potential single point of failure and network latency
- Specific rate limits for requests per minute and tokens per minute are not publicly documented
