Make VS 
OpenCode
In short
- Only Make offers free access.
Categories Automation, AI agents AI coding tools, AI agents
Pricing and payment
Pricing model Trial Trial
Starting price Free from $10/month
Free access Yes Trial access
Pricing plans - Free — Free
- Core (Pay annually, 10k credits/mo) — $10.59 / 10,000 credits
- Pro (Pay annually, 10k credits/mo) — $18.82 / 10,000 credits
- Teams (Pay annually, 10k credits/mo) — $34.12 / 10,000 credits
- Enterprise — Contact for pricing
- Go — $10/month
- Enterprise — Price not specified
- Zen — Pay as you go
Regional payment options Pay directly on the website Pay directly on the website
Pricing last changed
Ratings and reviews
Editorial assessment Strong technology platform Strong technology platform
Functionality High High
Price and value Good High
Ease of use Average Good
Reliability and support Good Good
Innovation Good High
User rating +1 +4
Data freshness
Service status Online, checked Online, checked
Last full review of the listing
Checked
Values come from catalog data: collected pricing, editorial assessments, reviews and the verification history. How we assess tools
Make Strong technology platform +1 Pros
- Granular visual flow control with native iterators, aggregators, and parallel routers
- Deep AI catalog with native modules for OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and custom REST endpoints
- Sophisticated error directives including automatic retries via execution queues
- Native autonomous agent framework supporting Model Context Protocol (MCP) and tool use
Cons
- Steep learning curve requiring a clear grasp of JSON schemas, arrays, and API logic
- Strict runtime constraints including a 40-second webhook response timeout and per-step payload limits
- Complex, sprawling scenarios become difficult to inspect and maintain without strict documentation
OpenCode Strong technology platform +4 Pros
- Fully open-source platform with a strict local-first, zero-retention privacy architecture
- Real-time LSP diagnostics catch type errors and broken imports during code generation
- Dual Plan and Build modes prevent unprompted or destructive edits to repository files
- Wide model compatibility covering major providers, local setups, and existing subscriptions
Cons
- Requires Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) for a stable terminal and tooling workflow on Windows
- Configuring multiple external API providers and tool permissions demands baseline developer familiarity
- Session sharing publishes conversations to web edge CDNs unless explicitly disabled in organization settings
